Intel took the performance route: higher TDPs and a hybrid new x86 architecture.ĪMD, on the other hand, focused more on efficiency and delivering best-in-class integrated graphics.īuyers are now faced with a plethora of choices, each of which has its own unique pros and cons.Īpple’s chipsets are still in a league of their own when it comes to performance-per-watt, but they do, in all fairness, come with a series of limitations and drawbacks that buyers need to be aware of.
They’re more advanced and way more powerful than their predecessors. Their recent processors (Alder Lake and Ryzen 6000, respectively) sort of tell the whole tale. This particular SoC (to say nothing of the ones that followed) pushed Intel and AMD in ways no one ever expected and we, the end consumers, have benefited greatly as a result.īoth companies had to step up big time so as not to be left in the proverbial dirt. The M1 was released a whopping two years ago and, by this point, everyone’s well aware of just how potent and game-changing it actually was. Is There Any Alternative to Apple Silicon?Īpple’s ARM-based chipsets are no longer a novelty.
0 kommentar(er)
